What do you understand as Doctrine of Bias? How judiciary applies the Doctrine as basic facet of Principles of Natural Justice? Explain.
>
0
Comments
 |
| What do you understand as Doctrine of Bias? How judiciary applies the Doctrine as basic facet of Principles of Natural Justice? Explain. |
Que: What do you understand as Doctrine of Bias? How judiciary applies the Doctrine as basic facet of Principles of Natural Justice? Explain.
Ans:
1] Introduction
The Doctrine of Bias is a fundamental concept in administrative law that serves as a cornerstone in upholding the principles of natural justice and ensuring fair decision-making by administrative authorities. Natural justice, often referred to as procedural fairness, is an essential aspect of the rule of law, and it mandates that decisions made by administrative bodies are not tainted by bias or prejudice. This article explores the Doctrine of Bias in administrative law, its application in civil, criminal, and constitutional matters, and its significance in ensuring justice and fairness.
2] Understanding the Doctrine of Bias
The Doctrine of Bias, also known as the rule against bias, is a legal principle that requires decision-makers, including administrative officials, judges, and tribunals, to be impartial and unbiased when making decisions that affect the rights, interests, or liberties of individuals. This principle is based on the belief that justice cannot be served if those responsible for making decisions have preconceived notions, prejudices, or a vested interest in the outcome.
3] Provisions Under Civil Law
In civil matters, the Doctrine of Bias plays a crucial role in ensuring that administrative decisions are fair and just. The following are key provisions and principles related to bias in civil law:
Section 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (India): This provision empowers a party to challenge a judge's jurisdiction if there is a reasonable apprehension of bias. It ensures that litigants in civil cases have confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary.
Principle of Nemo Judex in Causa Sua: This Latin maxim means "no one should be a judge in his own cause." It is a fundamental principle of natural justice that prohibits decision-makers from adjudicating cases in which they have a personal interest.
4] Provisions Under Criminal Law
In criminal law, the Doctrine of Bias is equally important to safeguard the rights and liberties of accused individuals. Some provisions and principles related to bias in criminal law include:
Section 479 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (India): This section allows for the transfer of criminal cases from one court to another if the accused can demonstrate a reasonable apprehension of bias or lack of impartiality.
Presumption of Innocence: A fundamental principle in criminal law is the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. Judges, prosecutors, and law enforcement agencies must adhere to this principle to ensure that accused individuals receive a fair trial without bias.
5] Provisions Under Constitutional Law
In constitutional law, the Doctrine of Bias is closely tied to the principles of natural justice enshrined in various constitutions around the world. Notable provisions related to bias in constitutional law include:
Article 14 of the Indian Constitution: This article guarantees the right to equality before the law and prohibits discrimination. The Doctrine of Bias is essential to uphold this constitutional promise, ensuring that all individuals are treated fairly and without bias by administrative authorities.
Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses in the United States: The U.S. Constitution contains due process and equal protection clauses, which are interpreted to include the requirement of impartiality in administrative proceedings and judicial decisions.
6] Application of the Doctrine of Bias by the Judiciary
The judiciary plays a pivotal role in applying the Doctrine of Bias as a basic facet of the principles of natural justice. Courts are responsible for ensuring that administrative decisions are free from bias, and they do so through the following mechanisms:
Recusal: When a judge or decision-maker is confronted with a situation that may give rise to bias, they are often required to recuse themselves from the case. This voluntary withdrawal ensures that the decision is made by an impartial party.
Objective Test for Bias: Courts apply an objective test to assess whether a reasonable person, with knowledge of all relevant facts, would conclude that there is a real likelihood of bias. This test helps in determining whether the Doctrine of Bias has been violated.
Judicial Review: In cases where bias is alleged, individuals can seek judicial review of administrative decisions. The court examines the decision-making process, assesses whether bias or prejudice existed, and may set aside the decision if it finds a breach of natural justice.
7] Unique Features of the Doctrine of Bias
Presumption of Impartiality: The Doctrine of Bias starts from the presumption that decision-makers are impartial. It places the burden on the party alleging bias to prove its existence.
Flexibility: The Doctrine of Bias is flexible and adaptable to various situations. It can apply to both actual bias (where there is evidence of prejudice) and perceived bias (where there is a reasonable apprehension of bias).
Protection of Fundamental Rights: By ensuring that administrative decisions are made without bias, the Doctrine of Bias safeguards the fundamental rights and liberties of individuals, promoting a just and fair society.
8] Provisions under Various Acts
While the Doctrine of Bias is primarily a common law principle, it is applied and reinforced by various statutes and acts in different jurisdictions. Some of these include:
The Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (India): This act establishes administrative tribunals to adjudicate disputes involving administrative actions. It ensures that tribunal members are appointed impartially and that decisions are made without bias.
The Right to Information Act, 2005 (India): This act allows individuals to access information held by public authorities. Ensuring transparency and fairness in the disclosure process is vital to prevent bias in decision-making.
9] Conclusion
The Doctrine of Bias is a foundational concept in administrative law, ensuring that administrative decisions are fair, just, and free from any taint of prejudice or bias. It is a fundamental aspect of the principles of natural justice, which form the bedrock of the rule of law in democratic societies. By upholding the Doctrine of Bias, the judiciary plays a vital role in safeguarding the rights and liberties of individuals, promoting transparency and accountability in administrative actions, and maintaining public trust in the justice system.
References:
- Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (India).
- Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (India).
- The Constitution of India, 1950.
- Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 (India).
- Right to Information Act, 2005 (India).
- Wade, H. W. R., & Forsyth, C. F. (2021). Administrative Law. Oxford University Press.
- Craig, P. P. (2017). Administrative Law. Sweet & Maxwell.
- International Commission of Jurists. (2005). Principles of Judicial Independence.
- R. v. Sussex Justices, Ex parte McCarthy [1924] 1 KB 256 (UK).
- Ridge v. Baldwin [1964] AC 40 (UK).
- Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248 (India).
- A. K. Kraipak v. Union of India, (1969) 2 SCC 262 (India).
Thank you for reading!
Tags :
Administrative Law
Post a Comment